econ-dem@unisi.it    

 

News

Manifesto

Documents

Links

Bibliographies

Essays

Seminars

Conferences

Italia

Contact Us

 

 

EURED

 
European Union for the Research

in Economic Democracy
 


was founded the 15th of June in Stockolm following an idea
launched at the European Social Forum in
Florence.
About 40 persons from many parts of
Europe were present at the foundation.


Our intention is to give rise to a network of researchers in the field of
Economic Democracy. We decided to use this site
to give information and publish essays and documents.
 

The association is informal. No subscription fees are required
and anybody can join us. Just send a message to


econ-dem@unisi.it

 

 

 EURED's Conference in Stockholm

14th-15th of June, 2003

click here for the summary of the workshop

 go to Conferences for the complete papers

 

 

EURED's Workshop at the

European Social Forum

Paris, 13th of November 2003

 

"The New Financial Capitalism

and Economic Democracy"

 

 

The workshop was aimed at discussing some trends of the contemporary capitalist systems and their effects on economic democracy. In particular, the workshop has taken its steps from the following consideration: the rise of financial institutions as key actors in the  international economic scene has been accompanied by the introduction of new corporate governance settings and new forms of  employment relations.

These measures, which tend to modify the previous structures of ownership, control and risk-bearing, include for instance the spread of short term labor contracts, the Employees Stock Ownership Plans (ESOP), the executive stock options, the rise of pension funds, etc. We wondered then whether these devices actually endow workers of a significant decisional power, and how they affect the workers' welfare.

Luigi Cerri argued that the introduction of pension funds in Europe would not enhance economic democracy. The introduction of pension funds attracts today some leftist thinkers because, by using workers' savings to purchase the stock of corporations, these funds might enhance workers' influence on corporate decision making; nevertheless, a pension fund cannot be compared to a Meidner-plan workers' fund,  since it is to be placed in an open market framework, and as such it will probably mimic the strategy of other institutional investors. Indeed, the functioning of american pension funds shows that trade union funds may hardly deviate from a shareholder value oriented policy.

Gaëtan Flocco analyzed the ideological background and the arguments used by  French policy makers to support the introduction of pension funds and employees stock ownership. He found out five main arguments: the attempt to increase workers' income, given the disequilibrium between profits and wages; the attempt to limit the ingerence of foreign investors; the intrinsic problems of mutual pension systems; the efficient incentive structure of indexed compensation schemes; and the attempt to grant more power to waged workers. He claimed that none of these arguments is convincing: workers' stock ownership turns out to provide a secure source of finance to corporations, and at the same time it legitimates a wage reduction; foreign investors would not be affected by the presence of domestic pension funds, since the latter would probably place a consistent share of their assets abroad; furthermore, neither capitalization pension systems nor incentive compensations schemes proved to be more efficient than the systems that they are supposed to replace; finally, ownership of preferred stock does not grant to employees' any increased power of voice.

Alessandra Pelloni provided several figures about the income inequality in the United States. She compared the ratio between the top and the bottom 10% percentiles throughout the years, and she found out that inequality has dramatically increased in the post-war period. She remarked that the nowadays level of income inequality is similar to that of the early 20th century; in the New Deal era inequality had actually decreased, and it was in the same period that U.S. saw the emergence of a "middle class". Besides, she provided evidence that one major source of income inequality is the increasing gap between top executives' and unskilled workers' wages: the ratio between the two wages has increased by about two hundred thousand percent. She concluded by reminding how the question of income inequality is important to any program aiming at enhancing economic democracy.

 

go to Seminars for the complete papers